For the people who think I am not creative & do not put any work into a wallpaper. Here is the Source pic & the resultant wallpaper, first I repaired the image using 3 versions of the same image to get all the missing bits, resizing & colour/brightness balancing before combining them to get a whole image; Then I creating a whole new background made up of several layer/images finally combining the two.

DD

Dave, screw them. I like it! for the wall.

>> For the people who think I am not creative & do not put any work into a wallpaper.

Seriously?

Great job as usual, DD.

Well, yeah. It's really easy to just digitally remove my watermark and add you're own.



This is clearly my original work. All you're doing is stealing and taking credit for my hard work.

Do not forget you are the one who restarted all this & will not leave it alone try being an adult & let sleeping dogs lie. If you think you will drive me away from Superiopics with your childish behaviour forget it all you are doing is embarrassing yourself. As for your ATTEMPT at humour defamation any idiot can see your little joke had the bottom 50 pixels chopped of removing the the signature and treating everyone else as fools will hardly score you points.

DD

Nice !

Firstly, I would like to say thanks to Dave for the Wallpaper and all your other Emma Watson Wallpapers. I have every one of them saved on my pc, and I still have the Emma wall you made me a couple of months back as my desktop.
Secondly, I don't really want to get into this argument that your two are having, but you gotta admit DLH (who I am still a fan of your work) that wall in your post has the bottom bit cut off which could easily (and Im not saying that you have) be done.
In future wallpapers for both and other wallpaper makers, although Im not a huge fan of this idea, try putting a difficult to remove watermark in the center of the main object of the wallpaper. This might stop other people copying your wallpapers.
However this shouldnt be needed in future walls if you can trust other members. Other wallpaper contributors on this forum (no names needed) have very simple, but hugely popular wallpapers (and im a huge fan of one contributors work, especially as his wallpapers lead me to this forum 5 years ago), and don't require huge annoying watermarks.
Hope this is okay. And again for the wall!

A. You don't know me well enough to know that it's not possible for me to embarrass myself.

B. Actually YOU started it with your constant rambling on about all the hard work you put into your wallpapers. Your pedantic attention to watermarks and using every single wallpaper thread as a means to stroke your own ego is what is starting it.

The reality is, I spend countless hours on wallpapers too. But you will not find a watermark on mine (other than the one above that you clearly stole). You just got your panties in a wad because someone didn't want to stare at your silly name in the middle of their computer screen. That is your real issue with me. I never once tried to pass off your work as my own. I just didn't want your name on my computer desktop. I know that someone with an ego as overwhelming large as yours can't possibly fathom why someone wouldn't want to stare at your name all day long, but the fact is, people don't. They like cool artwork, they like modified pictures, they like sweet wallpapers - but you constantly putting your name on it, like you own it - is going too far. You didn't take that photo, you just manipulated it. Just like I do. Just like hundreds of other people do. But unlike the rest of us, your ego won't let you see that. We all spend hours on a single wallpaper. Oh well. But we don't brand other people's original photography as our own.

why don't you both give it a rest.