A court in Germany has ruled that circumcising young boys for religious reasons amounts to bodily harm.

In a decision that has caused outrage among Jewish and Muslim groups, the court said that a child's right to physical integrity trumps religious and parental rights.

The case involved a doctor who carried out a circumcision on a four year-old that led to medical complications.

Thousands of Muslim and Jewish boys are circumcised in Germany every year.

Although male circumcision - unlike female circumcision - is not illegal in Germany, the court's judgement said the "fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents".

Circumcision, it decided, contravenes "interests of the child to decide later in life on his religious beliefs".
'Protect religious freedom'

The doctor involved in the case was acquitted and the ruling is not binding, but correspondents say it sets a precedent that would be taken into account by other German courts.

The president of Germany's Central Council of Jews, Dieter Graumann, called it "an unprecedented and dramatic intervention in the right of religious communities to self-determination".

He urged the country's parliament to clarify the legal situation "to protect religious freedom against attacks".

Male circumcision is part of the ancient religious rituals of both the Jewish and Muslim faiths, as well as the traditions of some tribal groups.

In some countries, such as the United States, it is also not uncommon for parents to request that young boys are circumcised for health reasons.

The BBC's Stephen Evans in Germany says it is unclear what the next legal step with be, but this issue is a moral and political minefield.

On the other hand, chopping the tip off the dick of a person unable to consent.

All the men who went out of the city gate agreed with Hamor and his son Shechem, and every male in the city was circumcised.

Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male. (Gen 34:24-25)

I don't see how cutting the foreskin can be something damaging to a child.

I don't see how cutting the foreskin can be something damaging to a child.

If you're so sure that something like that is so impossible to be "damaging" then let me make a suggestion. To prove your hypothesis, why don't you get a kitchen knife and slice off some mof your own personal skin? Say, a quarter inch. I'll be nice and let you decide from where (and I damn sure wager that even if you were dumb enough to accept the challenge, you'd probably avoid the entire pubic area).

If you're so sure that something like that is so impossible to be "damaging" then let me make a suggestion. To prove your hypothesis, why don't you get a kitchen knife and slice off some mof your own personal skin? Say, a quarter inch. I'll be nice and let you decide from where (and I damn sure wager that even if you were dumb enough to accept the challenge, you'd probably avoid the entire pubic area).

Parents should not pierce their daughters earlobes either, then. Since the girls have no say on it.

Most girls who get their ears (or anything else) pierced are doing so of their own volition. I've never heard of parents taking an infant to get their ears pierced, or forcing a teen or pre-teen to get their ears pierced against their will.