Bleh. I was countering the sewer spew that you made with the same shit in return. It appears that it's okay to do that here. I usually don't stoop as low as liberals do with their bullshit.

Another thing, pal... I'm not religious. So take your rant to someone who actually gives a shit about religion.

I'm canadian gumby..I'm not elegible to vote..so don't go blaming me.

Ah... "nutters" are we?

Your breathtaking display of ignorance (and that's being kind) leads me to wonder how you even manage to chew food!

In just THREE YEARS Obama has managed to add more to the national debt than Bush did in 8 freaking years!

Obama's deficits for 3 years running have ALL been over a TRILLION DOLLARS! Those deficits DWARF Bush's annual deficits.

When Obama was inaugurated the national debt was $6.3 trillion ($7.5 trillion by the end of fiscal year 2009, which ended in Sept. 2010 - Bush's last budget); today the national debt now sits at $15.4 TRILLION DOLLARS!!!

Obama has managed to run up more debt in THREE FREAKING YEARS than the last 43 Presidents COMBINED!!!

Yeah... we're the "nutters" here...

I'd say you're suffering from a case of leftist hysterical blindness.

That, or you'd better start getting someone to cut up your food for you.

Amateur...

Aw, you blew it, Tex. You said you never got involved in name-calling.

amateur huh?

I like how you kids throw the budget stuff out there but conveniently leave out the part that for the first time since they began.. Obama started including the cost of the wars in the budget. Of course that gives you repugs plenty of fake ammo to whine about.. when once again.. it was YOUR party's fault.

any other fake issues you think are relevant?

Also for someone whose party thinks they can fix the economy they broke.. cutting the budget will have the opposite effect

with so many people out of work.. budget cuts will shrink the economy, increase unemployment and reduce tax revenues.. which will worsen the ratio of the debt to the total economy. The priority must be getting jobs and growth back by boosting the economy. Only then, when jobs and growth are returning, should we think about cutting the deficit.

Of course all conservatives can obsess about is cutting cutting cutting.. which will utterly destroy the shaky economy Obama has been able to restore after they damn near killed it.

2007 - Democrats take over the Senate and the Congress. At the time, The DOW, GDP, and Unemployment were around 12,621.77, 3.5%, and 4.6%, respectively. Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION and economic recovery after the bursting of the DotCom bubble and 9/11 (which I'm sure you also blame Bush for).

2007 - Barney Frank takes over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd takes over the Senate Banking Committee. 15 months later, an economic meltdown in BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES. DOW, GDP, and Unemployment all take a massive hit, thanks to (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans (all made possible by Bill Clinton beefing up the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act to force mortgage lenders to relax their rules to allow more socially disadvantaged borrowers to qualify for home loans and repealing the Glass-Steagall Act, which ensured a complete separation between commercial banks, which accept deposits, and investment banks, which invest and take risks) on the economy from... you guessed it, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop/intervene Fannie & Freddie, starting in 2001, because it was financially risky for the US economy. No Dice.

Who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? The Vacationer-in Chief.
Who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? Mr. Teleprompter and his all-knowing Democratic Congress.

I see... and now who is "making up fake arguments" and "stretching to find arguing points?"

It is utter bullshit to claim that "right wingers" want a "theocracy" and it illustrates the insane lengths to which unhinged leftists will go to demonize the right.

And what this says about your tolerance for Marxism is no less disturbing.

And just to set you straight, NO ONE fares well under Marxism, save for (but only temporarily) the tyrant running a Marxist country and those in the tyrant's favor.

But then you'd have known that if had had even a passing acquaintance with a history book.

Dummy!



Sadly, no... not at all. Leftists make it all too easy.

It is not utter bullshit to claim republicans want a theocracy.. when every decision they make is based off some religious dogma or another.

As for the guy who called Obama the "vacationer in chief".. nice.. although he's nowhere near the vacation days your guy took.. sooo nice try

and on the subject of Marxism.. quit being a dope. Again.. I wasn't arguing FOR marxism.. I simply said if it was a choice between the two.

also @ Fullham.. stop copy/pasting from BS spam mails lol..


When Clinton took office, the DOW was 3241.95. On his last day it office it was 10587.59.

When G. W. Bush took office, the DOW was 10587.59. On the last day of his term, it was down to 7949.09.

When Obama took office, the DOW was 7949.09. At this very second (2/24/12 9:49pm) it is at 12982.95

Like Shakira's hips.. the facts don't lie.