From who? Examples?



Adolf is spelled with an "f" at the end. And he may be right, but what he has proposed to solve this problem is what reminds you strangely of the NSDAP.



Are you actually comparing guns to religion?
I assume you're saying that I apply the stereotype of "guns leading to gun owners doing bad things" to every gun owner?
And that's not true, I'm simply saying that it's inevitable that guns will fall into the wrong hand.
Anything in a responsible man's hand won't be dangerous, it's the irresponsible ones you have to consider.

No I wasn't comparing gun to religion, but the mind set that you have been using lately in your anti-gun rants. You make it seem that anyone who owns a gun will go on a shooting rampage and therefor no one should have guns, Just because once in a while someone does go off like that. That is called stereotyping, which you have done before. The part that I have bolded is exactly what I meant.

No, I don't think every gun owner will go off on a killing spree. I realise that this is only a very small minority.

What my problem with guns is that the current gun laws will make it that much easier for that small minority to go off on a killing spree. Sure, they could use knives, bats, etc. but chances are that they will not be able to kill/hurt as many people with that as they would with a gun.

The one question I ask myself about guns is: Is it really necessary?
You think of it as a punishment to prevent everybody from owning a gun. I don't see it as such. I see it as a step to ensure public safety.

But let me make this clear:

I am in favor of stricter gun laws, but I'm not in favor of banning guns altogether in the US. I think too many guns are in circulation, whether legally or in the black market, that a gun ban would truly lead to only the criminals having guns.
Whenever I debate this subject, I apply it to no country in general, I simply state facts as they are.
I still oppose easying the gun ban in Europe because without many guns around, deadly crime in Europe is significantly lower there than in the US. Of course, that has other factors as well.

I'm not going to play that game. Go read a few threads in the religion section. It's useless to post examples because you dismiss everything under the sun even if it's hard evidence.

you read your first topic????????????
i suppose that your next thread will be on one of your other obsessions with the islamization of europe(homosexuality, abortion, french-speaker...)

Don't pull that stupid crap DAS...

I read the article I posted.I did not find any incrimanating words he said. I admited I did not know much about this dutch politician.You and bubbles claim he was an extremist.You must provide proof of your acusation of this man.

Now give us some examples of this guy being one of the most extreme right wing politicians in Europe today.
Has he said anything that is comparable to what muslim extremists stated about the jews and Isreal?

Has he gone on record that he wants to erradicate every muslim in Europe?

If you cannot provide the answer then you cannot back up your accusations.

Now if you cannot provide proof then you are bearing false witness and slander.

1oldminer is denying that Wilders is an extremist. That is the funniest thing I have heard all year

the oldest of my 2 daughters, she's 9 years and at the school, she reads "Zadig" of "Voltaire", she goes to a public school...




huge bullshit!!! french school are laic!!! RELIGION ARE ILLEGAL!!!!!







proof it! good luck!




not in france

_____________________________________

all the text is an accumulation of lie or the half-truth in the only purpose to manipulate the idiots.

Hitler, 60 years ago, has convinced millions of people around the world that there were too many Jews and later that Jews should be exterminated, but if you want to support a new hitler, you're free of your choice.

yesterday, i wanted to lock the thread, i didn't it and i was wrong.

this surprise you?

No. So much seems to have changed in my 3 weeks away but some things always stay the same